نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار، گروه حقوق اسلامی، دانشگاه علوم قضایی و خدمات اداری دادگستری، تهران، ایران.
2 دانشجوی دکتری فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.
3 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق خصوصی، دانشگاه علوم قضایی و خدمات اداری دادگستری، ایران، تهران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Implying indication is one type of context indication. This implies the speaker's intent and determines whether the connotation in an exclamatory sentence or the meaning in a declarative sentence is true. Generally, the principles of Islamic jurisprudence (usul al-fiqh) accepts the credit of implying indication. Belief in the generality or non-generality of the implication of necessity is effective in the category of inference from rulings and law. It can be accepted in the law and be used for interpretation laws as the civil code, commercial code, and criminal code. The application of the context indication does not present any problem in the interpretation of civil and commercial laws in which the broad interpretation is accepted as the principle. Similarly, the principle of the necessity of narrow interpretation does not preclude the validity of the implication in substantive criminal law. Because narrow interpretation does not mean interpretation of any kind of ambiguity. Therefore, the legislator's intent must first be discovered and if it is not possible to discover the will of the legislator, then doubt is interpreted in favor of the accused. The implication is used to interpret (the) contract as well, and it is valid unless it violates the law or public policy.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)
