نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The issue of lawsuits arising from administrative and petroleum contracts in courts is one of the most important topics in administrative law. This study aims to examine the necessity of having multiple authorities to resolve disputes arising from Iran’s administrative and oil contracts and to determine how such multiplicity can be justified if it is indeed necessary. Given the different implications of the content and form of the concept of administrative contracts, and considering contemporary legal approaches, the study also explores the doctrines and propositions concerning the role of intermediaries in resolving administrative arbitration disputes. The research method, based on its purpose, is practical in nature, and based on its approach and data collection method, it is a non-experimental descriptive study. Therefore, there was no specific statistical population or sampling method, and the research was mainly conducted in a library environment using documentary tools. The study follows a descriptive-analytical approach and employs content analysis. Based on the findings, it was revealed that the participation of executive and legislative authorities in resolving disputes in Iran is a common phenomenon; however, it cannot be considered legitimate or necessary, as it may lead to violations of the rights of parties contracting with the government. Many arbitration and prosecution institutions, with their plurality and capabilities, have been proposed as potential solutions, but these should ideally be institutionalized under a single specialized judicial authority, namely the Administrative Justice Court.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)
