نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
It is the main focus of the criminal policy of any country to prevent and cope with crimes, and to realize this objective, various means should be utilized in participatory, judicial, and legislative types of criminal policy. With the increasing expansion of cyberspace, the use of computers and the internet by people, and the possibility of crimes against information technology, it is of great importance to set an appropriate criminal policy against cybercrimes. Legislative criminal policy is a regulatory task in a country by which the legislative body takes technical measures to secure cyberspace, sometimes implicitly and sometimes explicitly, while dealing with cybercrimes, one of the most important of which is the enactments of the Cyberspace High Council. In participatory criminal policy, different governmental and non-governmental tools are used for the prevention of and response to crime. One method for controlling cybercrimes, which can be carried out by civil bodies and individuals with public participation and can be considered an example of “enjoining good and forbidding bad” in preventing cybercrimes, is supervision of inputs and outputs, through which access of attackers to financial information is blocked—for example, by using passwords on computers and anti-monitoring software as one of the most important methods. In judicial criminal policy, which is reflected in judicial procedures and court verdicts, the judiciary acts with a preventive approach regarding cybercrimes, with the help of other authorities such as the MAHER Center (CERTCC – Computer Emergency Response Team Coordination Center), the APA Center (CERT – Computer Emergency Response Team), and the Cyber Police.
)
