نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
Article 135 of the Penal Code ratified in 1370 defines pimping as “linking together two or more people for adultery or sodomy.” Article 242 of the new Penal Code (ratified in 1392) has confirmed the provisions of the previous article in different terms, but with little change in content: “Pimping is bringing two or more persons to commit adultery or sodomy.” The contents of the two articles indicate the agreement of well-known Imamie jurists, or at least the most widely accepted among them. In contrast, a significant number of jurists have developed the meaning of pimping. They believe that the absolute concept of bringing together and making a relationship—whether it be for adultery, sodomy, or lesbianism—should be regarded as an instance of pimping. The author has provided a third view by reviewing this issue. He believes that pimping, as a crime with its punishments mentioned in jus canonical, has only one sense that includes “making a relationship for fornication or adultery,” and that other items are different and are crimes entrusted to the judge. It seems that the author’s opinion in this theory is solitary. This paper defends the author’s position by criticizing his rivals and providing the necessary supporting evidence.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)
