An Analysis of the Impact of Human Rights Discourse on the Realization of a Unified Islamic Ummah: A Review of Legal and Religious Commonalities

Document Type : Review Article

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 PhD Student in Public International Law, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Persian Gulf International Campus, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

‌ ∴ Introduction ∴ ‌
In recent years, human rights discourse has gained significant prominence as a powerful framework for shaping international policies, legal systems, and cultural identities. Its universal claims to safeguard dignity, liberty, and equality have prompted many nations and communities to integrate human rights principles into their legal and ethical codes. Concurrently, the concept of a Unified Islamic Community, rooted in Islamic teachings, aspires to foster solidarity, justice, and a collective identity among Muslims and monotheists worldwide. Although these two discourses—human rights and the Islamic Community—may initially seem divergent, they share foundational values, such as dignity and justice, which can promote a more harmonious global society.
     The intersection of human rights discourse and the Islamic Community is complex. While universal human rights frameworks were primarily developed within Western legal traditions, Islamic teachings are anchored in their own ethical and jurisprudential systems, derived from sources such as the Quran and Sunnah. This divergence has sparked debates about the compatibility of these two discourses and whether they inevitably clash. These debates manifest in various cultural, legal, and political contexts. For instance, universal human rights instruments advocate for principles like freedom of religion, freedom of expression, and non-discrimination, while interpretations of Islamic law in many Muslim-majority societies can either reinforce or appear to contradict certain aspects of international human rights conventions.
     In this context, globalization adds further pressure on Islamic communities. Rapid advancements in communication, the rise of multicultural societies, and increasing global interconnectedness can simultaneously challenge and reinforce collective identities. On one hand, globalization can lead to cultural homogenization, raising concerns that local religious traditions may become diluted. On the other hand, global networks can serve as platforms for Islamic scholars and institutions to engage in constructive dialogue, articulate diverse perspectives, and pursue shared goals. Therefore, understanding how human rights discourse can be reconciled with the vision of a Unified Islamic Community is particularly critical.
     Contemporary challenges facing Islamic societies—ranging from political instability to social fragmentation—underscore the urgency of constructing or reinforcing a shared sense of identity that resonates with a broad segment of believers. If human rights principles, such as dignity, fraternity, and justice, can be shown to align with fundamental Islamic tenets, they may serve as a unifying force, strengthening bonds within and among Muslim communities. Conversely, if these principles are perceived as inherently external or incompatible, they may generate internal conflict that undermines unity. Within this context, developing a nuanced understanding of how human rights discourse interacts with the theological, legal, and cultural dimensions of Islamic thought could prove invaluable for policymakers, scholars, and religious leaders.

‌ ∴ Research Question ∴ ‌
In light of these considerations, the core inquiry guiding this study is:
     How can human rights discourse contribute to the realization of the concept of a Unified Islamic Community?
     This central research question reflects the tension between the universalist claims embedded in modern human rights frameworks and the distinct vision of a unified community grounded in Islamic teachings. While numerous scholarly works have individually focused on human rights or the idea of the Unified Islamic Community, there is a notable gap in the literature regarding their confluence and potential synergies. By addressing this question, the study aims to explore whether, and under what conditions, a constructive overlap between human rights norms and Islamic principles can foster a more cohesive Muslim identity and, by extension, a stronger collective Islamic presence in global affairs.

‌ ∴ Research Hypothesis ∴ ‌
Based on preliminary observations and existing scholarship, this paper posits the following primary hypothesis:
     By relying on the commonalities between human rights principles and Islamic teachings—particularly values such as fraternity, justice, and human dignity—it is possible to strengthen internal cohesion and facilitate steps toward realizing a Unified Islamic Community.
     This hypothesis assumes that certain core tenets of Islam share conceptual and practical parallels with international human rights discourse. Both frameworks emphasize the preservation of human life, the pursuit of social and economic justice, and the importance of moral accountability. However, this proposition does not overlook potential areas of conflict; rather, it highlights the need for engaging in interpretive processes that bring Islamic jurisprudential tradition into meaningful dialogue with contemporary global norms. By testing this hypothesis, the article aims to illuminate where these discourses converge and how tensions might be reconciled or mitigated through informed and respectful discourse.

‌ ∴ Methodology & Framework, if Applicable ∴ ‌
The study adopts an interdisciplinary approach, drawing on legal analysis, theological inquiry, and socio-political theory. First, it conducts a doctrinal review of international human rights instruments, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and subsequent treaties, to identify the overarching principles that define the global understanding of human rights. Second, it systematically examines select Islamic legal and theological sources—primarily the Quran, the Sunnah, and jurisprudential commentaries—to identify principles that resonate with or diverge from these global norms.
     Using comparative analysis, the research highlights overlapping constructs—such as the sanctity of life, the imperative of justice, and the emphasis on moral accountability—and explores how these shared elements might reinforce a sense of unity within the Islamic Community. Alongside this textual investigation, the study considers historical and contemporary case studies to illustrate how Muslim-majority societies have grappled with the practical implementation of human rights. By assessing successful examples of legal and policy frameworks that integrate human rights norms with Islamic principles, as well as instances of discord, the research seeks to build a robust analytical model for understanding this complex relationship.
     Finally, the article employs an inductive reasoning process, drawing on specific cases, scholarly interpretations, and policy outcomes to infer broader insights about the capacity of human rights discourse to serve as a catalyst for unity within Islamic contexts. Rather than presenting a monolithic view of Islamic law or homogenizing international human rights discourse, the methodology remains attentive to the diversity of interpretations and applications in different cultural, historical, and political settings. Through this comprehensive framework, the study endeavors to provide policymakers, religious scholars, and academics with constructive pathways toward aligning human rights objectives with Islamic imperatives, without prematurely dismissing the genuine challenges inherent in this alignment.

‌ ∴ Results & Discussion ∴ ‌
The findings of this study underscore both the promise and complexity of using human rights discourse to strengthen the realization of a Unified Islamic Community. On one hand, the research identifies notable congruencies between the universal principles enshrined in international human rights instruments and the core tenets of Islamic teachings. Concepts such as fraternity, justice, human dignity, and the imperative of peaceful coexistence emerge as shared ethical pillars. These commonalities can catalyze social cohesion and collective identity among Muslims. When human rights principles are appropriately contextualized within Islamic jurisprudential frameworks, they can amplify values central to the Community, reinforcing unity among believers.
     However, the study also reveals areas of tension when universal human rights claims intersect with the specific legal and cultural norms of Muslim-majority societies. Some interpretations of jurisprudential thought may view certain components of human rights discourse as externally imposed or incompatible with local traditions. These tensions indicate that achieving harmony between the two discourses requires nuanced interpretive approaches. Instead of a one-size-fits-all model, an integrative process—whereby Islamic legal experts and human rights advocates collaboratively explore the interpretive breadth and depth of both traditions—proves most conducive to constructive engagement.
     Empirically, the examination of legal, policy, and social measures across various Islamic countries confirms that constructive dialogue between these two discourses is not only possible but has been partially realized. Initiatives that incorporate human rights education into religious curricula, support grassroots advocacy for women’s and minority rights within an Islamic framework, and encourage intergovernmental cooperation among Muslim-majority nations provide tangible evidence of how these shared values can be operationalized. Such endeavors help mitigate the perception that human rights norms are strictly “Western” constructs, revealing their alignment with deeply rooted Islamic ethics.
     Additionally, the proliferation of digital platforms and social media presents both opportunities and challenges for deepening awareness of human rights values in Islamic contexts. New media can serve as a vehicle for disseminating knowledge about the compatibility of Islam and human rights, facilitating community-building and dialogue. However, unregulated or partisan use of these platforms can exacerbate misunderstandings or fuel divisions. This underscores the need for skillful, well-informed communication strategies that highlight points of alignment, promote respectful debate, and foster collaborative initiatives among diverse stakeholders.

‌ ∴ Conclusion ∴ ‌
The impact of international human rights discourse on the concept of a Unified Islamic Community is inherently multifaceted. While innate tensions may arise between the universal claims of human rights and the distinctive vision of an Islamic Community, continuous and effective support for rights rooted in Islamic values is crucial for preserving the authenticity and relevance of Islamic faith in the modern world.
     This research evaluated how human rights discourse contributes to the realization of a Unified Islamic Community, finding that an emphasis on shared principles such as fraternity, justice, human dignity, and peaceful coexistence can significantly enhance the Community’s cohesion and integrity. These points of concordance between Islamic teachings and human rights norms provide a powerful basis for collective identity, enabling Muslims to align modern legal frameworks with foundational religious principles.
     A key contribution of this study is the delineation of practical approaches to fortify this alignment, including targeted human rights education programs within Muslim communities, strategic use of social media to disseminate complementary Islamic and rights-based values, and the creation or enhancement of international institutions dedicated to collaboration among Islamic nations. By adopting these strategies, Islamic societies can mitigate cultural or jurisprudential frictions while reinforcing their internal solidarity.
     In light of these findings, future research should conduct comparative analyses across diverse Islamic jurisdictions, investigate the evolving role of international bodies, and perform in-depth case studies. Such endeavors would further illuminate how best to reconcile Islamic legal and ethical frameworks with the global aspirations of human rights, advancing the shared goal of a cohesive, equitable, and principled Islamic Community.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. The Holy Quran.
  2. Adil, M. A. M., & Ahmad, N. M. (2014). Islamic law and human rights in Malaysia. Islam and Civilisational Renewal, 5, 43–67.
  3. Aditya, Z. F., & Al-Fatih, S. (2021). Indonesian constitutional rights: Expressing and purposing opinions on the internet. International Journal of Human Rights, 25(9), 1395–1419.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2020.1826450
  4. Al-Fatih, S., & Aulia, F. I. (2021). Tanggung jawab negara dalam kasus COVID-19 sebagai perwujudan perlindungan HAM. Jurnal HAM, 12(3), 349–366.
    https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2021.12.349-366
  5. Alston, P., & Goodman, R. (2013). International human rights: The successor to international human rights in context. Oxford University Press.
  6. Amnesty International. (2020). Human rights in the Islamic world: Report on the state of human rights. Amnesty International.
    https://www.amnesty.org/en/
  7. An-Naim, A. A. (1990). Toward an Islamic reformation: Civil liberties, human rights, and international law. Syracuse University Press.
  8. Aouragh, M., & Ess, C. (2012). The dark side of the revolution: The internet's role in Arab uprisings. The Information Society, 32(1), 71–80.
  9. Apriliani, D., Tafa, D., & Al Munawwar, F. (2024). Islam and globalization in the study of tafsir maudhu’i. Bulletin of Islamic Research, 2(2), 217–236.
    https://doi.org/10.69526/bir.v2i2.29
  10. Baderin, M. A. (2003). International human rights and Islamic law. Oxford University Press.
  11. Davari, Mohsen (1389 SH/2010). Mafhūm-e Ḥoqūq-e Bašar Dar Taʿālīm-e Eslāmī [Concept of Human Rights in Islamic Teachings]. Pažūhešnāme-ye Ḥoqūq-e Eslāmī [Journal of Islamic Law Research], 11 (1), pp. 87–113. doi: 10.30497/law.2012.1243 [in Persian].
  12. Donnelly, J. (2013). Universal human rights in theory and practice. Cornell University Press.
  13. Ghamami, Seyyed Mohammad Mehdi, & Salahee, Sohrab (1391 SH/2012). Qodrat-e Narm-e Neẓām-e Asāsī-ye Jomhūrī-ye Eslāmī-ye Īrān Dar Taḥaqqoq-e Ārmān-e Waḥdat-e Eslāmī [Soft Power of the Constitutional System of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Realizing the Ideal of Islamic Unity]. Faṣlnāme-ye Moṭālaʿāt-e Qodrat-e Narm [Quarterly Journal of Soft Power Studies], 2 (6), pp. 113–147 [in Persian].
  14. Habibnezhad, Seyyed Ahmad, & Taskhiri, Mohammad Saleh (1395 SH/2016). Taqnīn-e Moštarak-e Kešvarhā-ye Eslāmī Dar Ḥouze-ye Ḥoqūq-e Bašardūstāne [Common Legislation of Islamic Countries in the Field of Humanitarian Law]. Pažūheš-e Taṭbīqī-ye Ḥoqūq-e Eslām Va Ġarb [Comparative Research on Islamic and Western Law], 3 (4), pp. 29–48. doi: 10.22091/csiw.2018.1664.1141 [in Persian].
  15. (2021). Annual report. International Court of Justice.
  16. Ja'fari, Mohammad Taqi, & Movaṣṣeqi Gilani, Ahmad (1375 SH/1996). Estrātežī-ye Waḥdat Dar Andīše-ye Sīyāsī-ye Eslām [The Strategy of Unity in Islamic Political Thought]. Qom: Islamic Propagation Office [in Persian].
  17. Jamshidi, Hasan (1384 SH/2005). Houyyat, Ḥoqūq-e Bašar Va Qorʾān Az Ummat-e Yegāne Tā Ummathā-ye Besyār [Identity, Human Rights, and the Qur'an: From the Single Nation to Many Nations]. Našrīye-ye Ḥouze [Hawzah Journal], 22 (127), pp. 17–78 [in Persian].
  18. Javadi Amoli, Abdollah (1398 SH/2019). Tafsīr-e Tasnīm (Vol. 10) [Tasnim Exegesis]. Qom: Asra [in Persian].
  19. Johnson, M. (2021). The impact of international human rights discourse on Muslim communities. Journal of Human Rights Studies, 15(3), 250–267.
  20. Khomeini, Seyyed Rouhollah (1372 SH/1993). Ṣaḥīfe-ye Nūr (Vol. 21) [Book of Light]. Tehran: The Institute for Compiling and Publishing Imam Khomeini's Works [in Persian].
  21. Khorramaraee, Atefeh, Javan Arasteh, Hossein, & Nikounam, Vahid (1402 SH/2023). Jahānī Šodan; Čālleš-e Ummat-e Wāḥede-ye Eslāmī [Globalization; The Challenge of the Islamic Single Nation]. Ḥokūmat-e Eslāmī [Islamic Government], 2 (108), pp. 102–130 [in Persian].
  22. Khoshdel Mofrad, Hossein (1399 SH/2020). Bāzšenāsī-ye Maʿnā-ye «Ummat-e Wāḥede» Bā Taʾkīd Bar Āye-ye «Wa Law Šāʾa Rabbuka La Jaʿala Al-Nāsa Ummatan Wāḥidatan Wa Lā Yazālūna Muḫtalifīn» (Hūd/118) [Revisiting the Meaning of "Ummat-e Wāḥede" (The Single Nation) with Emphasis on the Verse "And had your Lord willed, He would have made mankind one nation; but they continue to differ"]. Dufaṣlnāme-ye Pažūheš-nāme-ye Tafsīr Va Zabān-e Qorʾān [Bi-Quarterly Journal of Qur'an Exegesis and Language Studies], 16, pp. 29– doi: 10.30473/quran.2020.6999 [in Persian].
  23. Majlesi, Mohammad Baqer ibn Mohammad Taqi (1400 SH/2021). Biḥār al-Anwār; al-Jāmiʿa li-Durar Aḫbār al-Aʾimma al-Aṭhār (Vol. 71). Qom: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi [in Arabic].
  24. Majma' Taqrib Madhahib Eslami (1400 SH/2021). Gozāreš-e Faʿālyathā-ye Majmaʿ-e Taqrīb-e Maḏāheb-e Eslāmī [Report on the Activities of the Assembly for Proximity of Islamic Schools of Thought]. Tehran: Assembly for Proximity of Islamic Schools of Thought [in Persian].
  25. Makarem Shirazi, Naser, & Ali Babaee, Ahmad (1386 SH/2007). Bargozīde-ye Tafsīr-e Nemūne (Vol. 4) [Selected Exemplary Exegesis]. Tehran: Islamic Books House [in Persian].
  26. Mamdani, M. (2001). When victims become killers: Colonialism, nativism, and the genocide in Rwanda. Princeton University Press.
  27. Mesbah Yazdi, Mohammad Taqi (1391 SH/2012). Jāmeʿe Va Tārīḫ Az Negāh-e Qorʾān [Society and History from the Perspective of the Qur'an]. Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute [in Persian].
  28. Motahhari, Morteza (1369 SH/1990). Walāyat Va Walāʾhā [Governance and Patronage]. Tehran: Sadra [in Persian].
  29. Mousazadeh, Ebrahim (1401 SH/2022). Ḥoqūq-e Baynolmelal Dar Eslām (2nd ed.) [International Law in Islam]. Tehran: Dadgostar [in Persian].
  30. Muedini, F. (2010, January 12). Examining Islam and human rights from the perspective of Sufism. De Gruyter, 7(1).
    https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4419.1172
  31. Nasiri, Bahram, & Haji Esmaeili, Mohammad Reza (1399 SH/2020). Rahyāfthā-ye Hamgarāyāne Dar Negāh-e Qorʾān Karīm Bā Taʾkīd Bar Ārā-ye Tafsīrī-ye Mufassirān Az Āye 9 Sūre-ye Ḥuĵurāt [Convergent Approaches in the View of the Holy Qur'an with Emphasis on the Exegetical Opinions of Commentators on Verse 9 of Surah Al-Hujurat]. Dufaṣlnāme-ye ʿElmī-ye Moṭālaʿāt-e Qorʾān Va Ḥadīṯ [Scientific Bi-Quarterly Journal of Qur'an and Hadith Studies], 1 (27), pp. 287–306. doi: 10.30497/quran.2020.14442.2822 [in Persian].
  32. (1990). Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam. Organization of Islamic Cooperation.
  33. (2021). Annual report of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. Organization of Islamic Cooperation.
  34. Payghan, Nematollah (1380 SH/2001). Ummat-e Wāḥede; Az Hamgarāʾī Tā Wāgarāʾī [The One Nation: From Convergence to Divergence]. Našrīye-ye ʿUlūm-e Sīyāsī-ye Dānešgāh-e BāqeralʿOlūm [Journal of Political Science of Baqer al-Oloom University], 15, pp. 209–224 [in Persian].
  35. Qaraati, Mohsen (1383 SH/2004). Tafsīr-e Nūr (Vols. 2, 3, 4, 8 & 9) [Nour Exegesis]. Tehran: Cultural Center of Lessons from the Qur'an [in Persian].
  36. Saberi Tavallaee, Ali (1404 SH/2025). Ḥoqūq-e Bašar ʿAlayh-e Ḥoqūq-e Bašar; Goftmān-e Ḥoqūq-e Bašar Az Zabān-e Rahāʾībaḫš Tā Abzār-e Salṭe [Human Rights Against Human Rights: From Emancipation to Domination]. Pažūhešnāme-ye Ḥoqūq-e Eslāmī [Journal of Islamic Law Research], 26 (1), pp. 1–46. doi: 10.30497/law.2024.246467.3557 [in Persian].
  37. Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
  38. Shahram Akbarzadeh, & Benjamin MacQueen. (2008). Human rights: An Islamic perspective. Routledge.
  39. Tabarsi, Fazl ibn Hasan (1372 SH/1993). Majmaʿ al-Bayān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān (Vol. 10). Tehran: Naser Khosro [in Arabic].
  40. Tabatabaee, Mohammad Hossein (1374 SH/1995). Tarjome-ye Tafsīr al-Mīzān (Vol. 2) [Translation of Tafsir al-Mizan]. Qom: Islamic Publications Office [in Persian].
  41. United Nations Human Rights Office. (2021). Annual report. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.
  42. United Nations. (1948). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. United Nations.
  43. United Nations. (2020). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-of-human-rights/index.html
  44. Wronka, Joseph. (2023). Human rights and social justice: Social action and service for the helping and health professions (3rd ed.). Cognella.
    https://lnkd.in/enw37crj
  45. Zhussipbek, G., & Nagayeva, Z. (2019, January 1). Epistemological reform and embracement of human rights: What can be inferred from Islamic rationalistic Maturidite theology? De Gruyter Open, 5(1), 347–365.
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2019-0030
  46. https://khamenei.ir/