A Legal Inquiry into the Burial of the Deceased on Private Properties in Islamic Jurisprudence

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law, University of Qom, Qom, Iran.

2 PhD Student in Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, University of Qom, Qom, Iran.

Abstract

‌ ∴ Introduction ∴ ‌
The tradition of burying the deceased on private properties, resulting in the formation of family gravesites outside public cemeteries, is a practice driven by a complex mix of emotional, financial, and urban development considerations. This practice, which includes the establishment of family mausoleums by aristocratic families and notables, is historically rooted in various countries, including Islamic religious cities concerning certain esteemed Islamic scholars. While some of these private burial sites have transitioned into public cemeteries, their inception was not intended for public use, underscoring a tradition of proprietary control over such burials. The practice raises significant questions within the framework of Islamic jurisprudence and law, especially concerning absolute legal authority of the owner to exercise dominion or control over property [Taslit] (absolute right of an owner to deal with his property as he wishes) and its implications for burying individuals on private property. This inquiry seeks to explore the stance of Islamic law and jurisprudence, alongside modern legal systems, on the legality and permissibility of such burials amidst contemporary urban and societal challenges.
‌ ∴ Research Question ∴ ‌
The central question guiding this research is whether Islamic law and jurisprudence, alongside national laws in Islamic countries, permit the burial of the deceased on private property, given the broad implications for urban development, public health, and societal norms. This question encompasses the investigation of the extent to which the principle of Dominance within Islamic jurisprudence allows for such practices and how contemporary urban living requirements and societal interests intersect with or diverge from these traditional practices.
‌ ∴ Research Hypothesis ∴ ‌
The hypothesis posited by the authors suggests a potential reconciliation between the Islamic jurisprudential rule of absolute legal authority of the owner to exercise dominion over property [Tasleet] and the no harm principle [La-Za’rar], proposing that it might be permissible to bury the deceased on one's private property under specific circumstances. This hypothesis implies a nuanced understanding of property rights within Islamic law that accommodates the evolving needs of modern urban societies while adhering to Islamic legal principles and societal values.
‌ ∴ Methodology & Framework, if Applicable ∴ ‌
The methodology adopted in this study is descriptive, analytical, and doctrinal, aiming to dissect and understand the multifaceted issue of burial on private properties within the context of Islamic jurisprudence and law. This approach involves an extensive review of primary and secondary sources, including jurisprudential rulings, works of Islamic scholars, and legal texts, to elucidate the foundational Islamic ruling on burial practices. The analysis further extends to the examination of modern positive law, particularly Iranian Civil Law and Islamic Penal Code, and its treatment of such burials considering environmental, social, and urban development aspects. The doctrinal framework is employed to interpret and reconcile traditional Islamic rulings with contemporary legal standards and societal expectations, aiming to provide a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter and propose viable legal and religious solutions.
     This paper presents a thorough investigation into the complex interplay between religious doctrine, legal principles, and societal needs regarding the burial of the deceased on private properties. By examining the practice through the lenses of Islamic jurisprudence and contemporary law, the study seeks to offer insightful perspectives and potential reconciliations that respect both traditional values and modern realities.
‌ ∴ Results & Discussion ∴ ‌
The comprehensive analysis conducted in this study reveals a nuanced spectrum of perspectives within Islamic jurisprudence and Iranian law regarding the burial of the deceased on private properties. Central to this discourse is the principle of personal ownership and the rights it encompasses, which traditionally include the disposition of property in various manners, burial of the deceased being one such manner. Despite some Islamic scholars' interpretation of narrations from the Prophet of Islam (PBUH) as prohibiting such burials, a closer examination and alternative interpretations suggest that the practice can indeed be permissible. This permissibility is supported by the Sunnah of the Ahl al-Bayt, absence of explicit prohibition by the Islamic legislator, and the overarching principle of dominion over one's possessions.
     However, the discourse does not end with the establishment of permissibility. The study delves deeper into the social jurisprudence perspective, highlighting significant concerns associated with private burials, such as psychological distress, potential for disease transmission, environmental degradation, and harm to others. These concerns present formidable challenges to the outright acceptance of burial on private property as a permissible act. The Iranian legal system's stance, reflecting these concerns, explicitly prohibits such burials, incorporating both criminal penalties and provisions for civil damages in cases where private burials cause harm.
‌ ∴ Conclusion ∴ ‌
The intricate interplay between religious doctrine, legal standards, and social welfare culminates in a complex yet critical conclusion regarding the burial of the deceased on private property. While Islamic jurisprudence provides a foundational permissibility based on property ownership and rights, the practice's potential social, health, and environmental repercussions necessitate a more cautious approach. The study underscores that the absolute prohibition observed in Iranian substantive law, although seemingly at odds with traditional Islamic rulings and historical practices, is primarily justified by the tangible risks associated with private burials.
     However, the study proposes a balanced approach, advocating for legislative reforms that allow for exceptions under stringent conditions. Such conditions include societal acceptance, absence of harm, and cases where the deceased's burial site could serve a broader community interest, such as promoting knowledge or religious devotion, typically applicable to celebrities or scholars. This approach aims to reconcile the initial permissibility with contemporary societal needs and legal frameworks, suggesting a case-by-case evaluation rather than a universal application.
     Furthermore, the discussion on affordability and access to public cemetery spaces opens another dimension to the debate, suggesting economic considerations as a potential justification for private burials in specific scenarios. This perspective highlights the need for a legal and religious framework that accommodates both traditional Islamic principles and the practicalities of modern societal living.
     In conclusion, while the study affirms the foundational permissibility of burial on private property within Islamic jurisprudence, it also acknowledges the multifaceted challenges posed by such practices. The recommendation for a legislative approach that allows for exceptions under carefully defined conditions reflects an attempt to harmonize religious principles with the realities of contemporary urban life, emphasizing the importance of adaptability and consideration for the common good in Islamic law and jurisprudence.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. The Holy Quran.
  2. Almāsī, Nijād ʿAlī (1401 SH). Ḥuqūq-i Bayn al-Milāl-i Khūṣūṣī [Private International Law]. 21st ed., Tehran: Mīzān [in Persian].
  3. al-Sharīf, Muḥammad Mahdī (1392 SH). Manṭiq-i Ḥuqūq Pizhūhishī dar Manṭiq-i Ḥākim bar Tafsīr va Istidlāl-i Ḥuqūqī [Logic of Law: A Study in the Logic Governing Legal Interpretation and Reasoning]. Tehran: Sahāmī Intishār [in Persian].
  4. Āmilī, Sayyid Muḥammad Jawād Ḥusaynī (1429 AH). Miftāḥ al-Karāmah [The Key to Dignity]. Qom: Muʾassasat Nashr Islāmī [in Arabic].
  5. Asqalānī Shāfiʿī, Aḥmad ibn ʿAlī ibn Ḥajar Abū al-Faḍl (1379 AH). Fatḥ al-Bārī Sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī (Vol. 1). Beirut: Dār al-Maʿrifah [in Arabic].
  6. Bārīklū, ʿAlīrezā (1390 SH). Amvāl va ḥuqūq-i mālī [Properties and financial rights]. Tehran: SAMT [in Persian].
  7. Bujnūrdī, Sayyid Ḥasan ibn Āqā Buzurg Mūsawī (1428 AH). Al-Qawāʿid al-fiqhī Vol. 8, 1st ed. Qom: Al-Hādī [in Arabic].
  8. Guldūzīyān, Īraj (1387 SH). Maḥshā-yi Qānūn-i Mujāzāt-i Islāmī [Annotated Islamic Penal Code]. Tehran: Majd [in Persian].
  9. Ḥakīm, Muḥammad Taqī (1418 AH). Al-Uṣūl al-ʿāmma fī al-fiqh al-muqā 2nd ed. Qom: n.p. [in Arabic].
  10. Hayāti, ʿAli ʿAbbās (1393 SH). Ḥuqūq-i Khānavādah [Family Law]. Tehran: Mīzān [in Persian].
  11. Haythamī, Abū al-Ḥasan Nūr al-Dīn ʿAlī ibn Abī Bakr ibn Sulaymān (1994). Majmaʿ al-Zawāʾid wa Manbaʿ al-Fawāʾid (Ḥusām al-Dīn al-Qudsī, Ed.). Cairo: Maktabat al-Qudsī [in Arabic].
  12. Ḥillī, Ḥasan ibn Yūsuf ibn Muṭahhar (1414 AH). Tadhkirat al-Fuqahāʾ (Vol. 2). 1st ed., Qom: Muʾassasat Āl al-Bayt (ʿalayhim as-salām) [in Arabic].
  13. Ḥillī, Ḥasan ibn Yūsuf ibn Muṭahhar (1420 AH). Taḥrīr al-Aḥkām al-Sharʿīyah ʿalá Madhhab al-Imāmīyah (Vol. 1). 1st ed., Qom: Muʾassasat Imām Ṣādiq (ʿalayh as-salām) [in Arabic].
  14. Ḥillī, Najm al-Dīn Jaʿfar ibn Ḥasan (1407 AH). al-Muʿtabar fī Sharḥ al-Mukhtaṣar (Vol. 1). Qom: Muʾassasat Sayyid al-Shuhadāʾ (ʿalayh as-salām) [in Arabic].
  15. Ḥillī, Najm al-Dīn Jaʿfar ibn Ḥasan (1408 AH). Sharāʾiʿ al-Islām fī Masāʾil al-Ḥalāl wa al-Ḥarām (Vol. 3). 2nd ed., Qom: Muʾassasat Ismāʿīlīyān [in Arabic].
  16. Ibn Abī Jumhūr, Muḥammad ibn Zayn al-Dīn (1403 AH). ʿAwālī al-laʾālī al-ʿazīzīya fī al-aḥādīth al-dīnīya (Muǧtabā ʿIrāqī, ed.). Vol. 1. Qom: Muʾassasat Sayyid al-Shuhadāʾ [in Arabic].
  17. Ibn ʿĀbidīn, Muḥammad Amīn ibn ʿUmar ibn ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz ʿĀbidīn al-Dimashqī al-Ḥanafī (1412 AH). Radd al-Muḥtār ʿalā al-Durr al-Mukhtā Vol. 2, 2nd ed. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr [in Arabic].
  18. Ibn Bābvayh, Muḥammad ibn ʿAlī (1385 SH). ʿIlal al-sharāʾ 1st ed. Qom: Dāwarī [in Arabic].
  19. Ibn Idrīs Ḥillī, Abū Jaʿfar Muḥammad ibn Manṣūr ibn Aḥmad (1428 AH). Al-Sarāʾir al-ḥāwī li-taḥrīr al-fatāwī. Vols. 1 and 3, 5th ed. Qom: Muʾassasat Nashr al-Islāmī [in Arabic].
  20. Ibn Manẓūr, Muḥammad ibn Mukarram (1414 AH). Lisān al-ʿ Beirut: Dār Ṣādir [in Arabic].
  21. Ibn Qudāma Maqdisī, Abū Muḥammad Muwaffaq al-Dīn ʿAbd Allāh ibn Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad ibn Qudāma (1968). Al-Mughnī. Vols. 2 and 5. Cairo: n.p. [in Arabic].
  22. Ibn ʿUthaymīn, Muḥammad ibn Ṣāliḥ ibn Muḥammad (1413 AH). Majmūʿ fatāwī wa-rasāʾil faḍīlat. Vol. 2. Riyadh: Dār al-Waṭan [in Arabic].
  23. Imāmī, Sayyid Ḥasan (n.d.). Ḥuqūq-i madanī [Civil rights]. Tehran: Islāmīya [in Persian].
  24. Jaʿfarī Langarūdī, Muḥammad Jaʿfar (1382 SH). Ṣad maqāla dar ravish-i taḥqīq-i ʿilm-i ḥuqūq [One hundred articles on the research method in legal science]. Tehran: Ganj-i Dānish [in Persian].
  25. Jaʿfarī Langarūdī, Muḥammad Jaʿfar (1388 SH). Ḥuqūq-i amvāl [Property law]. Tehran: Ganj-i Dānish [in Persian].
  26. Jamīʿī az Pūzhūhishgarān (1426 AH). Farhang-i fiqhī muṭābiq maḏhab ahl al-Bayt. Vols. 3, 1st ed. Qom: Muʾassasat Dāʾirat al-Maʿārif Fiqh Islāmī bar Maḏhab Ahl al-Bayt [in Arabic].
  27. Karājikī, Muḥammad ibn ʿAlī (1410 AH). Kanz al-Fawāʾid Dār al-Dhakhāʾ Qom [in Arabic].
  28. Khūʾī, Sayyid Abū al-Qāsim (1418 AH). Mawsūʿat al-Imām al-Khūʾī (Vol. 9). 1st ed., Qom: Muʾassasat Iḥyāʾ Āthār al-Imām al-Khūʾī [in Arabic].
  29. Khūʾī, Sayyid Abū al-Qāsim (1430 AH). al-Tanqīḥ fī Sharḥ al-ʿUrwat al-Wuthqá (Mīrzā ʿAlī Ghurawī, Reporter). (Vol. 9). 4th ed., Qom: Muʾassasat Iḥyāʾ Āthār al-Imām al-Khūʾī [in Arabic].
  30. Kulaynī, Muḥammad ibn Yaʿqūb (1407 AH). al-Kāfī (Vol. 2). Tehran: al-Islāmīyah [in Arabic].
  31. Majlisī, Muḥammad Bāqir ibn Muḥammad Taqī (1368 AH). Biḥār al-Anwār (Vol. 99). 1st ed., Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī [in Arabic].
  32. Majlisī, Muḥammad Bāqir ibn Muḥammad Taqī (1404 AH). Mirʾāt al-ʿUqūl fī Sharḥ Akhbār Āl al-Rasūl (Vol. 12). 2nd ed., Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmīyah [in Arabic].
  33. Mawāq Mālikī, Muḥammad ibn Yūsuf ibn Abī al-Qāsim ibn Yūsuf (1994). al-Tāj wa al-Iklīl (Vol. 3). 1st ed., Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmīyah [in Arabic].
  34. Māzandarānī, Muḥammad Ṣāliḥ ibn Aḥmad (1382 AH). Sharḥ al-Kāfī (Vol. 7). Tehran: al-Maktabah al-Islāmīyah [in Arabic].
  35. Miyārah Mālikī, Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad (2008). al-Durr al-Thamīn wa al-Mawrid al-Muʿīn (ʿAbd Allāh al-Manshāwī, Ed.). Cairo: Dār al-Ḥadīth [in Arabic].
  36. Muḥammadī, Sīmazar; Wāʿiẓī, ʿAbd al-Riḍā & Zarīnī, Ghulām Riḍā (1392 SH). Barrasī-yi Asarāt-i Ālūdagī nāshī az Qabristān-i Vādī Raḥmat Tabrīz bar Ābkhān-i Minṭaqah [Study of the Pollution Effects from Vadi Rahmat Cemetery in Tabriz on the Area’s Aquifer]. Hashtriyah Hamāyish-i Zaminshināsī Muḥandisī va Muḥīt Zīst-i Īrān [8th Conference on Environmental and Engineering Geology of Iran] [in Persian].
  37. Murādī, Muḥammad Taqī (1395 SH). Manshūr-i Ḥujrah-nishīnī [Manifesto of Monastic Living]. Qom: Sarā-yi Kitāb [in Persian].
  38. Muẓaffar, Muḥammad Riḍā (1370 SH). Uṣūl al-Fiqh (Vol. 2). Qom: Daftar-i Tablīghāt-i Islāmī [in Arabic].
  39. Najafī, Muḥammad Ḥasan (1362 SH). Jawāhir al-Kalām fī Sharḥ Sharāʾiʿ al-Islām (Vol. 4). Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī [in Arabic].
  40. Narāqī, Mullā Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad Mahdī (1415 AH). Mustanad al-Shīʿah fī Aḥkām al-Sharīʿah (Vol. 3). Qom: Muʾassasat Āl al-Bayt (ʿalayhim as-salām) [in Arabic].
  41. Narāqī, Mullā Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad Mahdī (1417 AH). ʿAwāʾid al-Ayyām fī Bayān Qawāʿid al-Aḥkām. Qom: Daftar-i Tablīghāt-i Islāmī [in Arabic].
  42. Nawawī, Abū Zakariyyā Muḥyī al-Dīn Yaḥyā ibn Sharaf (n.d.). al-Majmūʿ Sharḥ al-Muhadhdhab (Maʿ Takmilat al-Subkī wa al-Muṭīʿī) (Vol. 5). Beirut: Dār al-Fikr [in Arabic].
  43. Nayshābūrī, Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj Abū al-Ḥasan al-Qushayrī (n.d.). al-Musnad al-Ṣaḥīḥ al-Mukhtaṣar bi Naql al-ʿAdl ʿan al-ʿAdl ilá Rasūl Allāh Ṣallá Allāh ʿAlayhi wa Ālihi wa Sallam (Muḥammad Fuʾād ʿAbd al-Bāqī, Ed.) (Vol. 1). Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī [in Arabic].
  44. Rafīʿī ʿAlavī, Sayyid Aḥsan & Maḥjūb, Saʿīd (1400 SH). Sīyāsat-i Bāznegārī, Iṣlāḥ va Takmīl-i Niẓām-i Ḥuqūqī va Ravīyihā-yi Qaḍāʾī bā Tamarkuz bar ʿAql va Sīrah-yi ʿUqalā dar Ḥall-i Ikhtilāf-i Daʿāvī-yi Khānavādah [Policy of Review, Reform and Completion of the Legal System and Judicial Practices with a Focus on Reason and the Practice of Rational People in Resolving Family Disputes]. Muṭālaʿāt-i Fiqhī Ḥuqūqī Zan va Khānavādah [Jurisprudential Legal Studies of Women and Family], 4(8), pp. 103-134 [in Persian].
  45. Sanchūlī, Zaynab & Kīkhā, Muḥammad Riḍā (1401 SH). Kāwushī Nū dar Jahat-i Rafʿ-i Taʿāruẓ bayn Māddah-yi 38 Qānūn-i Madanī bā Qavānīn-i Mavṣūʿih Maḥdūdkunandah-yi Mālikīyat-i Khūṣūṣī [New research for resolving the conflict between Article 38 of The Civil Code with the laws restricting private property]. Pažūhešʹnāme-ye Hoqūq-e Islāmī [Journal of Islamic Law Research], 23(4), pp. 621-652. doi: 10.30497/law.2022.243232.3269 [in Persian].
  46. Shahīd Awwal, Muḥammad ibn Makī (1419 AH). Dhikrā al-Shīʿah fī Aḥkām al-Sharīʿah (Vol. 2). Qom: Muʾassasat Āl al-Bayt (ʿalayhim as-salām) [in Arabic].
  47. Shahīd Thānī, Zayn al-Dīn ibn ʿAlī (1413 AH). Masālik al-Afhām ilá Tanqīḥ Sharāʾiʿ al-Islā 1st ed., Qom: Muʾassasat al-Maʿārif al-Islāmīyah [in Arabic].
  48. Shahīd Thānī, Zayn al-Dīn ibn ʿAlī (1435 AH). al-Rawḍah al-Bahīyah. Qom: Majmaʿ al-Fikr al-Islāmī [in Arabic].
  49. Shaybānī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad ibn Ḥanbal (2001). Musnad al-Imām Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal (Shuʿayb al-Arnaʾūṭ, Ed.). Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risālah [in Arabic].
  50. Shobīrī Zanjānī, Sayyid Mūsá (1396 SH). Istiftāʾāt (Vol. 1). Qom: Markaz-i Fiqhī-yi Imām Muḥammad Bāqir (ʿalayhi s-salām) [in Persian].
  51. Shurbīnī, Shams al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad al-Khaṭīb (1415 AH). Mughni al-Muḥtāj ilá Maʿrifat Maʿānī Alfāẓ al-Minhāj (Vol. 2). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmīyah [in Arabic].
  52. Ṭabāṭabāʾī Yazdī, Sayyid Muḥammad Kāẓim (1409 AH). al-ʿUrwat al-Wuthqá (Vol. 1). 2nd ed., Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Aʿlamī lil-Maṭbūʿāt [in Arabic].
  53. Ṭūsī, Muḥammad ibn Ḥasan (1365 SH). Tahdhīb al-Aḥkām [Refinement of the Rules]. Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmīyah [in Arabic].
  54. Ṭūsī, Muḥammad ibn Ḥasan (1387 AH). al-Mabsūṭ fī Fiqh al-Imāmīyah (Vols. 1 & 3). 3rd ed., Tehran: Murtazawī [in Arabic].
  55. Yazdāniyān, ʿAlī Riḍā (1386 SH). Ḥuqūq-i Madanī; Qavāʿid-i ʿUmūmī-yi Masʾūlīyat-i Madanī [Civil Law; General Rules of Civil Liability]. Tehran: Mīzān [in Persian].