Formalities of Withdrawal of a Will and the Ways to Avoid Them under American Law; A Reflection on Iranian Law

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Private and Islamic Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 PhD Student in Private Law, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

3 PhD Student in Private Law, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

In most legal systems of the world, the creation of a ‘will’ requires the observance of certain formalities. Since these formalities show the genuine intention of the testator, hence they prevent fraud, facilitate and regulate legal proceedings related to wills, and they have always been paid attention by law-makers. Based on this, Iranian law only recognizes official, self-written (handwritten), and secret wills as legally effective wills. Similarly, in American law, the legal validity of a will requires to be formal, self-written (handwritten), or notarized. The question is raised as to whether the withdrawal of the will requires the observance of formalities or not. In other words, if the purpose of stipulating formalities in the phase of creation of a will is to protect the intention of the testator, prevent the deception of forgers, facilitate and regulate the legal proceedings concerning the will, then, do not these aims require that the withdrawal should also be based on formalities? In this article, an attempt is made to answer this question with a descriptive-analytical method. The conclusion is that in Iranian law, wording of Article 838 of the Civil Code, the silence of the Probate Code, and Imamiya jurisprudential views indicate that the withdrawal does not require formalities. However, the above-mentioned view, by an accurate analysis of Article 838 and considering functions of formalism, still have an aura of ambiguity. In contrast, the position of American law is evident; the legal validity of withdrawal depends on the satisfaction of certain formalities. Nevertheless, since the formalities of withdrawal lead to the ignorance of the testator’s intention in some cases, solutions have been provided to avoid them. These solutions have not been accepted yet, due to their weaknesses.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

امامی، سید حسن (1394). حقوق مدنی. تهران: اسلامیه.
تقی‌زاده، علی و عسگری، غلامحسین (1398). رجوع از وصیت تملیکی در حقوق مدنی ایران با مطالعه تطبیقی در حقوق مصر و انگلیس. مطالعات حقوق خصوصی، 49(3). صص.425-444.
جعفری لنگرودی، محمد جعفر (1390). حقوق مدنی: وصیت. تهران: گنج دانش.
حائری شاه‌باغ، سیدعلی (1396). شرح قانون مدنی. تهران: گنج دانش.
حسینی عاملی، محمدجواد (بی­تا). مفتاح الکرامة فی شرح قواعد العلامة. قم: مؤسسة النشر الاسلامی التابعة لجماعة المدرسین.
خویی، سیدابوالقاسم (1410ق). منهاج‌الصالحین. قم: مدینة‌العلم.
دادنامه شماره 140068390011806119 مورخ 22/8/1400، صادره از شعبه 22 دادگاه عمومی حقوقی مجتمع قضایی شهید بهشتی تهران.
رودیجانی، محمدمجتبی (1397). قانون امور حسبی در نظم حقوقی کنونی. تهران: کتاب آوا.
زین‌الدین، محمدامین (1413ق). کلمة التقوی. قم: مطعبه مهر.
سبزواری، سیدعبدالأعلی (بی­تا). مهذب الاحکام فی بیان حلال و الحرام. قم: دار التفسیر.
شهید اول، محمد بن جمال‌الدین (بی­تا). اللمعة الدمشقیة فی فقه الإمامیة. بیروت: دار التراث (دار الإسلامیه).
شهید ثانی، زین‌الدین بن علی (1410ق). الروضة البهیة فی شرح اللمعة الدمشقیة. قم: داوری.
شهید ثانی، زین‌الدین بن علی (بی­تا). مسالک الأفهام إلى تنقیح شرائع الإسلام. قم: مؤسسة المعارف الاسلامیة.
صادقی‌مقدم، حسن و میرجلیلی، محمدمهدی (1396). اقسام رجوع از وصیت در فقه امامیه و حقوق ایران. آموزه‌های حقوقی گواه، 3(2). صص. 5-26.
صفایی، سیدحسین و شعبانی کندسری، هادی (1397). حقوق مدنی (وصیت، ارث، شفعه). تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار.
طباطبایی، سیدعلی (1419ق). ریاض المسائل. قم: مؤسسة النشر الاسلامی التابعة لجماعة المدرسین.
عمید، موسی (1321). حقوق مدنی ایران ـ بخش دوم (هبه ـ وصیت ـ ارث). تهران: چاپخانه خودکار ایران.
فلاح ­زاده، علی ­محمد، درویش ­متولی، میثم (1392). نظارت شورای نگهبان بر قوانین مصوبِ پیش از انقلاب و شورای انقلاب. فصلنامه دانش حقوق عمومی، 2(5). صص. 103-122.
قاسم ­زاده، سیدمرتضی (1394). حق شفعه، وصیت و ارث. تهران: دادگستر.
قاسمی، محسن (1388). شکل‌گرایی در حقوق مدنی. تهران: میزان.
قافی، حسین و شریعتی، سعید (1393). اصول فقه کاربردی. تهران: پژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاه.
کاتوزیان، ناصر (1392). مقدمه علم حقوق و مطالعه در نظام حقوقی ایران. تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار.
کاتوزیان، ناصر (1398). دوره حقوق مدنی عقود معین (عطایا). تهران: گنج دانش.
کاتوزیان، ناصر (1399). وصیت در حقوق مدنی ایران. تهران: گنج دانش.
کریم­ زاده، احمد (1389). آرای دادگاه‌های انتظامی قضات (امور حقوقی). تهران: جنگل.
محقق حلی، جعفر بن حسن (1408ق). شرایع الاسلام فی مسائل الحلال و الحرام. قم: اسماعیلیان.
محقق داماد، سیدمصطفی (1387). بررسی فقهی و حقوقی وصیت. تهران: مرکز نشر علوم اسلامی.
وکیل، امیرساعد و عسکری، پوریا (1394). قانون اساسی در نظم حقوقی کنونی. تهران: مجد.
 
Beyer, Gerry W. & Hanft, John K(2015). Wills, Trusts, And Estates For Legal Assistants. New York, Wolters Kluwer.
Black, Henry Campbell(1968). Black’s Law Dictionary. Minnesota, West Publishing Co.
Chaffin, Verner F(1977). Execution, Revocation, and Revalidation of Wills: A Critique of Existing Statutory Formalities. Ga. L. Rev. 11(2), pp. 297-368.
Clowney, Stephan(2008). In Their Own Hand: An Analysis of Holographic Wills and Homemade Will making. Real Property, Trust and Estate Law Journal, 43(1), pp. 27-72.
Crawford, Bridget J(2019). Wills Formalities in the Twenty-First Century. Wisconsin Law Review, (2), pp.269-294.
Cushman, Barry(2019). The Decline of Revocation by Physical Act. Real Property, Trust & Estate Law Journal, (54), pp. 243-274.
Ekhator, Ekhorutomwen Gabriel(2020). Creating Electronic Will: Conflating the Traditional Wills Law with Contemporary Electronic Will. The University of Nigeria, Bar Journal, 6(1), pp. 9-32.
Evans, Alvin E(1935). Testamentary Revocation by Act to the Document and Dependent Relative Revocation. Current Legal Thought, 23(4), pp.559-588.
Fox, Jennifer L(2019). Twenty-First Century Wills. Prob. & Prop, 33(6), pp.52-55.
Gulliver, Ashbel & J. Tilson, Catherine(1941). Catherine Classification of Gratuitous Transfers. Yale Law Journal, 51(1), pp.1-39.
GGG, I(1960). Revocation of Wills by Subsequent Instrument. Virginia Law Review, 46(2), pp. 373-389.
Glover, Mark(2014). Decoupling the Law of Will-Execution. St. Johns Law Review, 88(3), pp. 597-652.
Grant, Joseph Karl(2008). Shattering and Moving Beyond the Gutenberg Paradigm: The Dawn of the Electronic Will. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform,42(1), pp. 105-139.
Langbein, John(1975). Substantial Compliance with the Wills Act, Harvard Law Review, 88(3), pp. 489-531
Sitkoff, Robert; Dukeminier, Jesse(2017). Wills, Trusts, and Estates. New York: Wolters Kluwer.
Sitkoff, Robert; Dukeminier, Jesse(2022). Wills, Trusts, and Estates. New York: Wolters Kluwer.
Hall, Paige(2019). Welcoming E-Wills into the Mainstream: The Digital Communication of Testamentary Intent. Nevada Law Journal, 20(1), pp. 339-372.
Hepburn, Samantha(2001). Principles of Equity and Trusts. Sydney- London: Cavendish Publishing Limited.
Hirsch, Adam J(2021), Models of Electronic-Will Legislation. Real Property, Trust and Estate Law Journal, 56(2), pp. 163-235.
Horton, David (2022). Revoking Wills. Notre Dame Law Review, 97(2), pp. 563-618
Lindgren, James (1990). Abolishing the Attestation Requirement for Wills. The North Carolina Law Review, 68(3), pp.541-574.
Friedman, Lawrence(1996). The Law of the Living, the Law of the Dead: Property, Succession, and Society. Wisconsin Law Review, 2, pp. 340-378.
Johanson, Stanley (2010), Gilbert Law Summaries on Wills, Chicago: Thomson/West.
McGovern Jr., William; F. Kurtz, Sheldon; M. English, David(2001). Wills, Trusts and Estates, Including Taxation and Future Interests, Minnesota: West Academic Publishing.
Perillo, Joseph (1974). The Statute of Frauds in the Light of the Functions and Dysfunctions of Form. Fordham Law Review, 43(1), pp. 39-82.
National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws(2019). Uniform Electronic Wills Act, Anchorage, Alaska: National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws.
Schwartz, Frederic S. (2004). Models of Will Revocation. Real Property, Probate and Trust Journal, 39(1), pp. 135-192.
Wendel, Peter (2018). Emanuel Law Outlines for Wills, Trusts, and Estates; Keyed to Sitkoff/Dukeminier, New York: Wolters Kluwer.
Whitman, Robert (1992). Revocation and Revival: An Analysis of the 1990 Revision of the Uniform Probate Code and Suggestions for the Future. Albany Law Review, 55(4), pp. 1035-1066.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 06 October 2022
  • Accept Date: 04 April 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics