The most important way to legally enhance brand credibility is to look at the brand as an independent entity. Under these circumstances, the brand becomes a commercial commodity that can be easily protected in various legal situations. Brand independence means that there is no need for the brand to necessarily communicate with the product or service that contains the brand. Among the problems and challenges facing the brand is that the brand may not reflect the nature and quality of the goods and services introduced. According to the studies conducted in this article, we came to the conclusion that the description of brand independence has two important effects, one of which is the ability to transfer and the second important effect of this description is related to the transfer of mobile information. It is with the brand that this effect seems to show more of the economic and marketing aspects of the brand. The description of brand independence is mentioned in paragraph 4 of Article 15 of the TRIPS Agreement and is mentioned as one of the conditions that can be upheld in this article. In addition, it should be noted that the lack of fair competition can be referred to and cited based on what is stated in the Paris Convention.
نصرالهی آزاد، مرضیه (1389). ثبت بینالمللی برند و کنوانسیونهای مربوط. تهران: انتشارات خرسندی.
ورمرزیار ارزانفودی، محمد (1381). حقوق برند با لحاظ موافقتنامه تریپس (جنبه تجارتی حقوق مالکیت معنوی). (پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد)، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.
George, Macgregor (2005). "The Nature of Information in the 21st Century: Conundrums for the Informatics Community?". Library Review, UK,54, No.1, pp. 2-25.
Giovanni B., Ramello& Silva, Francesco, (2006). "appropriating signs and meaning: the elusive economics of trade mark". industrial and corporate change, vol. 15, pp. 32-56.
Goldsmith, Scott Takacs and Charles Hofacker (1998). "Information as a product: not goods, not services", Journal of Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Volume 16, Number 3, pp. 65-78.
Jobber, D. (2001). principles& practice of marketing. 1st Ed, Berkshir: McGraw-Hill.
Kathleen, Petrich (2012). licensing Trade mark, a spectrum of quality control where a licensor can get burned at the outer edge, Licencin journal.
Keller, K. L. (2005). Building measuring and managing brand equity, New Delhi.
Kinsella, Stephan (2001). Against Intellectual Property, Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. 15, No. 2, Available at: www.mises.org.
Kirmani, A. & Sood, S. (1993). advertising, percivied quality and brand image, journal of marketing research, vol. 17.
Meyer, R. (2012). a multiattribute model of consumer choice during product learning, marketing science, vol. 4.
Robbins, Lionel (1993). An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, Macmillan.
Stobar, Paul (1994). Brand power, Macmillan press Ltd, London.
Territten, Guy (2001). intellectual property in Europe, oxford university press.
WIPO (2004). Intellectual property hand book, policy, law and use, wipo publication, No. 385.
Mozafari, M., & aminian, M. (2021). Legal analysis to protect brand owners against unfair use. The Journal of Islamic Law Research, 22(1), 297-312. doi: 10.30497/law.2021.239764.2934
MLA
Mostafa Mozafari; maryam aminian. "Legal analysis to protect brand owners against unfair use", The Journal of Islamic Law Research, 22, 1, 2021, 297-312. doi: 10.30497/law.2021.239764.2934
HARVARD
Mozafari, M., aminian, M. (2021). 'Legal analysis to protect brand owners against unfair use', The Journal of Islamic Law Research, 22(1), pp. 297-312. doi: 10.30497/law.2021.239764.2934
VANCOUVER
Mozafari, M., aminian, M. Legal analysis to protect brand owners against unfair use. The Journal of Islamic Law Research, 2021; 22(1): 297-312. doi: 10.30497/law.2021.239764.2934
)
