Reflection on the concept of equality in the legal system's approach to transnational documents

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Department of law, najaf Abad branch, Islamiz Azad University, Najaf Abad

2 Department of Law,Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran

Abstract

Citizens, regardless of their personal characteristics (such as race, gender, religion, social class, etc.) must be subject to a single legal system.modern government manages an equal society, and the members of this society must be equally obedient to universal power. Obviously, the intermediary of these relations is a law that governs the will of the public in society. The real picture of equality in the area of contract is where the equal conditions for all citizens to obtain administrative contracts are provided. Therefore, the inherent and acquired differences of citizens can not be considered an obstacle to the achievement of government contracts. In Iran, the constitution in its original principles has accepted the equality of citizens in certain ways. Therefore, the assumption of discrimination between citizens in terms of race, religion, political opinion, position, and ... is not accepted. Since this is not an area, but an allegory, this equality should be maintained in access to public services, one of the most important of which is the right to conclude and use employment contracts.
The concept of equality is one of the most challenging concepts in which various definitions are given. This dichotomy and ambiguity in the concept of equality, giving a precise and balanced classification of it, also presents a problem. However, in a general division, they have divided equality into legal equality, equality of opportunity and outcome equality. the author will refer to the descriptive-analytical method to study the concept of equality in Iranian law and transnational documents.

Keywords

References

  1. آبوت، پاملا و آلاس، کلر (1391). جامعه­شناسی زنان (ترجمه منیژه نجم­عراقی). تهران: انتشارات نی.
  2. ابوالحمد، عبدالحمید (1389). حقوق اداری ایران. تهران: نشر طوس.
  3. پناهی، حسین و دیگران (1395). «تأثیر نابرابری جنسیتی در آموزش بر رشد اقتصادی ایران». فصلنامه اقتصادی و توسعه، (5). صص 43-61.
  4. رشیدی، علی (1385). «شایسته‌سالاری کلید تحقق مردم‌سالاری». مجله اطلاعات سیاسی اقتصاد، (225-226)، صص. 62-67.
  5. زارعی، محمدحسین (1389). تقریرات درسی حقوق اداری. (کارشناسی ارشد)، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.
  6. زارعی، محمدحسین (1392). «تبعیض روا در آموزش عالی ایران با تأکید بر سهمیه‌های خاص». مجلس و راهبرد، 20(6)، زمستان، صص. 5-34.
  7. قلی‌پور، آرین و فتاحی، مهدی (1386). «تأثیر عدالت اجتماعی بر مهاجرت نخبگان». مجله رهیافت، (40).
  8. محمدی، حمزه (1392). تبعیض روا در نظام حقوقی ایران. (رساله دکتری رشته حقوق عمومی)، دانشگاه تهران پردیس فارابی، تهران، ایران.
  9. مهرپرور، حسین (1390). نظام بین­المللی حقوق بشر. تهران: انتشارات اطلاعات.
  10. ویژه، محمدرضا (1383). «مفهوم اصل برابری در حقوق عمومی نوین». نشریه حقوق اساسی، (2)، صص. 213-252.

 

  1. Bakke v. (1978). Regents of the University of California.
  2. Lyman Tower, Sargent (1390). "Contemporary political Ideologies: A comparative Analysis". ( 8 ed ). brooks / cole.
  3. Derlien, Hans-Ulrich, Peters, B. (2008). 15. The State at Work, Volume 1: Public Sector Employment in Ten Western Countries.
  4. Power, Duke Co (1971). https://www.britannica.com/event/Griggs-v-Duke-Power-Co.
  5. Steelworkers v. Weber, 443 U.S. 193 (1979). United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v. Weber.

 

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 22 February 2021
  • Revise Date: 10 May 2021
  • Accept Date: 21 June 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics