Document Type : Research Article
Authors
1
PhD student, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, UAE Branch, Islamic Azad University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
2
Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
3
Asistant Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Alame Aabatabaei, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
The principle of the release of defendants in criminal proceedings against the
exceptional use of their temporary detention inspires significant orientations in
criminal policy. This principle is also emphasized in jurisprudential
considerations, with exemplary cases of detention of defendants. The
importance of these two dimensions is heightened when the legislator
recognizes new supervisory mandates in support of defendants' release under
the 2013 Criminal Procedure Code. The developments in this law with respect
to Islamic jurisprudence are in the various aspects of the provision of
temporary detention and the feasibility of adapting judicial supervision to
jurisprudential considerations. In addition, the UK Criminal Law Authority, as
an example of different instances of security clearances, especially in the
context of temporary detention, makes the various aspects of the case more
precise. According to the benchmark review, it can be seen that these
oversight arrangements sometimes with security readings and sometimes
during the investigative phase will have wide scope for expediency of
competent judicial authorities in criminal justice, although this jurisdictional
and jurisprudential discretion. Practical Ruling The principle of proportionality
in English law is consistent, but the particular orientation of Iranian penal
policy to temporary detention reflects a legal and practical judicial approach.
Nonetheless, resorting to surveillance, mistrust and early resort to judicial
oversight in Iranian criminal law, and in line with jurisprudential
considerations based on the exception of temporary detention, except in cases
such as the charge of murder, do not supervise the defendants as security,
Rather, it provides another guarantee of securities arrangements different from
English law, rooted in security terms in securities. Therefore, it seems that
compliance with supervisory-based security responses is in line with the
jurisprudential demand and that it can be emphasized in order to increase its
use of structural and enforcement challenges in the judicial process and merely
to temporary detention which is of a nature Punishment is not used.
Keywords
)
