Effect transactions in the emergency caused by the reluctance of Jurisprudence and Iranian Law

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Abstract

Although the specific meaning today with the threat and overcome reluctance to happen in legal relations, there is less pressure to conclude a contract that affects a person's free will to other modes of glaring. Accordingly, although sometimes reluctantly in the form of emergency because of the urgency of MyPyvndd personal aspects, this pressure and external threats emerge in the context of a screw. This occurred in two cases MyPyvndd, which is divided into different types: 1. emergency contract due to reluctance on the transaction, 2. emergency contract due to reluctance on the hesitant action. On the effects of the transaction in distress in the first case, the opinions of jurists and lawyers is different. Jurists and lawyers know the correct emergency deal; it consequently warrants the accuracy, sanctions, nullity, and lack of influence over the limitations stated. It seems that due to the realization of the spiritual element of reluctance, lack of influence in this case of the transaction is consistent with legal logic. To effect a transaction in the second case, almost all of it blunt and know the difference. Accordingly, emergency transactions that actually occur in the context of external pressure are blunt and require further confirmation in distress; the correct emergency deal breathes as though in throughput.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 14 April 2017
  • Revise Date: 16 August 2018
  • Accept Date: 30 August 2018

Share

How to cite

Statistics