Context & Objective: The Golden Rule is a fundamental moral principle advocating that one should treat others as one wishes to be treated. Although this ethical standard appears in numerous pre-Islamic religions and Islamic texts Islamic jurists have not formally recognized it as a jurisprudential maxim. This research investigates the possibility of identifying the Golden Rule as a jurisprudential maxim and explores the reasons behind its historical exclusion from this categorization. The study questions whether the Golden Rule can function within Islamic jurisprudence and under what specific legal title it might operate. The objective is to delineate the exact status of this rule in jurisprudence by analyzing its core elements and structural compatibility with established jurisprudential criteria. Method & Approach: This study utilizes a doctrinal research method relying on library-based sources and deductive analysis. The approach is structured into three main sections. The first section identifies the constituent elements of the Golden Rule and evaluates its binding normative level. The second section compares the characteristics of standard jurisprudential maxims with the Golden Rule to test for structural alignment. The final section examines the position of the Golden Rule under the specific legal category of independent rational proofs evaluating its associated legal rulings implementation conflicts and potential to generate civil liability. Findings: The research reveals that the Golden Rule bridges theoretical and practical rationality through its core element of consistency which comprises the dual principles of conscientiousness and impartiality. This structural alignment allows the rule to qualify as an independent rational proof within Islamic jurisprudence. Rulings derived from this rule involve formal legal obligations and prohibitions regarding societal behavior which are established through the jurisprudential principle of correlation between rational and religious edicts. The rule inherently lacks conflict with other established legal maxims in theory. Whenever practical implementation clashes occur the Golden Rule takes precedence as the governing and more significant directive. Furthermore, disregarding this rule serves as a necessary but insufficient condition for establishing strict civil liability since actual damages or other specific legal triggers must also be present. Conclusion: Most Islamic jurists historically declined to adopt the Golden Rule as a formal jurisprudential maxim due to concerns about its reliance on human imagination and the variance in individual preferences. The analysis demonstrates however that the strict application of the consistency element nullifies these subjective variables and successfully guides legal reasoning toward definitive rulings based on universal human principles. The Golden Rule successfully transforms individual subjective desires into an objective and rational framework for social regulation. Recognizing this rule as an independent rational proof empowers jurists to enforce equitable social relations and prioritize public interest over arbitrary personal preferences in Islamic legal practice.
Akhund Khorasani, Mohammad Kazim ibn Hossein (1409 AH/1988). Kifāyat al-uṣūl (Vol. 2). Qom: Aal al-Bayt Institute [in Arabic].
al-Iraqi, Aqa Zia (1405 AH/1985). Nihāyat al-afkār. Qom: Society of Seminary Teachers [in Arabic].
al-Zarqa, Mustafa Ahmad (1418 AH/1997). al-Madḵal al-feqhī al-ʿām (Vol. 2). Syria: Dar al-Qalam [in Arabic].
Bible. (1971). Revised standard version of the Bible. The Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America.
Bousiliki, Hasan (1396 SH/2017). Moqāyeseh-ye basandegī va kārāmadī-ye qāʿideh-ye zarrīn bā qāʿideh-ye taʿmīm-pażīrī-ye Kānt [Comparison of the Adequacy and Efficiency of the Golden Rule with Kant's Rule of Generalizability]. Nashriyeh-ye Qabasat [Qabasat Journal], Vol. 22, No. 84, pp. 165-194 [in Persian].
Davoudi Beyraq, Hossein (1395 SH/2016). Tafsīr-e qavānīn-e šaklī (āyīn-e dādrasī-ye madanī) [Interpretation of Procedural Laws (Civil Procedure)] (Doctoral dissertation). Department of Islamic Law, University of Tehran [in Persian].
Deylami, Ahmad (1398 SH/2019). ʿAdālat beh-maṯābeh-ye enṣāf dar sonnat-e Eslām-e Šīʿī [Justice as Fairness in the Shi'i Islamic Tradition]. Nashriyeh-ye Olum-e Hadis [Journal of Hadith Sciences], Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 48-68 [in Persian].
Eslami, Sayyid Hasan (1386 SH/2007). Qāʿideh-ye zarrīn dar ḥadīṯ va aḵlāq [The Golden Rule in Hadith and Ethics]. Majalleh-ye Olum-e Hadis [Journal of Hadith Sciences], No. 4, pp. 36-45 [in Persian].
Fasihi Radmandi, Mehdi (1393 SH/2014). ʿAql-e naẓarī va ʿamalī [Theoretical and Practical Reason]. Paygah-e Pazhouheh: Baqir al-Olum Research Institute [in Persian].
Fayyad, Mohammad Ishaq (1410 AH/1989). Muḥāḍarāt fī uṣūl al-feqh (Taqrīrāt-e dars-e Āyatollāh Ḵūʾī). Qom: Dar al-Hadi [in Arabic].
Fayyadbakhsh, Marjaneh, Asgarkhani, Abu Mohammad, & Mirabbasi, Sayyid Baqer (1397 SH/2018). Naqš-e oṣūl-e ḥoqūqī dar rafʿ-e ejmāl va sokūt dar ḥoqūq-e Īrān (dar partov-e māddeh-ye 3-e āyīn-e dādrasī-ye madanī 1379) [The Role of Legal Principles in Resolving Ambiguity and Silence in Iranian Law (In the Light of Article 3 of the 2000 Civil Procedure Code)]. Motale'at-e Feqh va Hoquq-e Eslami [Islamic Jurisprudence and Law Studies], No. 113, pp. 309-331 [in Persian].
Gensler, H. (2013). Ethics and the golden rule. London: Routledge.
Gewirth, A. (1978). The golden rule rationalized. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 13, 133-147.
Ghomashi, Saeed (1380 SH/2001). Bāzšenāsī-ye jāygāh-e ʿaql dar feqh-e Šīʿeh [Re-recognizing the Position of Reason in Shi'i Jurisprudence]. Majalleh-ye Ravaq-e Andisheh [Ravaq-e Andisheh Journal], No. 3, pp. 30-50 [in Persian].
Hertzler, J. (1934). On golden rules. International Journal of Ethics, University of Chicago Press, 4, 418-436.
Hilli (Muhaqqiq), Najm al-Din (1409 AH/1988). Šarāʾiʿ al-Eslām fī masāʾil al-ḥalāl va al-ḥarām (Vol. 1). Qom: Ismāʿīlīyān Institute [in Arabic].
Hojjat, Minou (1395 SH/2016). Āyā pāyehhā-ye aḵlāqī ʿaqlānī-and; naqdī bar negareš-e Gensler dar bāb-e ʿaqlānīyat-e aḵlāqī [Are Moral Foundations Rational? A Critique of Gensler's Approach to Moral Rationality]. Majalleh-ye Hekmat va Falsafeh [Journal of Wisdom and Philosophy], Vol. 12, No. 46, pp. 7-20 [in Persian].
Izadpour, Mohammad Reza (1386 SH/2007). ʿAql va kašf-e malākāt-e aḥkām [Reason and Discovery of the Criteria of Rulings]. Faslnameh-ye Andisheh-ye Novin-e Dini [Journal of Modern Religious Thought], No. 11, pp. 127-144 [in Persian].
Jafari Tabar, Hasan (1399 SH/2020). Manṭeq-e ḥeyrānī [The Logic of Bewilderment]. Tehran: Farhang-e Nashr-e Now [in Persian].
Karimi Laski, Mohammad, & Faramarz Qaramaleki, Ahad (1395 SH/2016). Adyān-e bozorg, qāʿideh-ye zarrīn va dīgarī [Great Religions, the Golden Rule, and the Other]. Pazhuheshnameh-ye Akhlaq [Ethics Research Journal], No. 28, pp. 75-98 [in Persian].
Khodabakhshi, Hasan, Ayati, Sayyid Mohammad Reza, & Arabian, Asghar (1398 SH/2019). Bāzšenāsī-ye mafhūmī-ye żamān va aqsām-e ān dar feqh-e Eslāmī [Conceptual Recognition of Guarantee and Its Types in Islamic Jurisprudence]. Nashriyeh-ye Mabani-ye Feqhi-ye Hoquq-e Eslami [Jurisprudential Foundations of Islamic Law Journal], No. 24, pp. 9-40 [in Persian].
Khoei, Sayyid Abu al-Qasim (1417 AH/1996). Miṣbāḥ al-uṣūl (Vols. 1 & 3). Qom: Nashr al-Fiqahah [in Arabic].
Khoei, Sayyid Abu al-Qasim (1417 AH/1996). Muḥāḍarāt fī uṣūl al-feqh. Qom: Islamic Publications Office [in Arabic].
Khomeini, Sayyid Ruhollah (1375 SH/1996). Oṣūl-e feqh (Taʿādol va tarājīḥ) [Principles of Jurisprudence (Equilibrium and Preferences)]. Tehran: Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works [in Persian].
Khomeini, Sayyid Ruhollah (1392 SH/2013). Anvār al-hidāyah fī al-taʿlīqah ʿalā al-Kifāyah. Tehran: Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works [in Arabic].
Kulayni, Mohammad ibn Ya'qub (1407 AH/1986). al-Kāfī (Mohammad Hossein Derayati, Trans.). Qom: Dar al-Hadith Scientific-Cultural Institute [in Persian].
MacIver, R., & Spitz, D. (2005). The deep beauty of the golden rule. New York: Routledge.
Majlesi, Mohammad Baqir (1387 SH/2008). Biḥār al-anvār al-jāmiʿah li-durar aḵbār al-aʾimmat al-aṭhār (Ali Davani, Trans.) [Oceans of Light: A Comprehensive Collection of Pearls of the Teachings of the Pure Imams]. Tehran: Tehran Publications [in Persian].
Mesbah Yazdi, Mohammad Taqi (1405 AH/1985). Taʿlīqah ʿalā Nihāyat al-ḥikmah. Qom: Dar Rah-e Haq [in Arabic].
Meyers, Carol. (2005). Exodus. Cambridge University Press.
Mirshekari, Abbas, & Ramezany, Fatemeh (1402 SH/2023). Qāʿideh-ye ṭalāyī dar aḵlāq [The Golden Rule in Ethics]. Dāyirat al-maʿāref-e aḵlāq-e pezeshkī-ye Eslāmī [Encyclopedia of Islamic Medical Ethics], pp. 1-16 [in Persian].
Mirshekari, Abbas, & Ramezany, Fatemeh (1403 SH/2024). Tabyīn-e nesbat-e qāʿideh-ye ṭalāyī bā masʾūlīyat-e madanī [Elucidating the Relationship between the "Golden Rule" and Civil Liability]. Pazhuheshnameh-ye Hoquq-e Eslami [Journal of Islamic Law Research], Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 33-62. doi: 10.30497/law.2024.245349.3441 [in Persian].
Qaraei Soltanabadi, Ahmad, & Nazari Tavakkoli, Saeed (1394 SH/2015). Mafhūm-e enṣāf dar aḵlāq-e Eslāmī va nesbat-e ān bā qāʿideh-ye zarrīn [The Concept of Fairness in Islamic Ethics and Its Relation to the Golden Rule]. Pazhuheshnameh-ye Akhlaq [Ethics Research Journal], No. 28, pp. 41-56 [in Persian].
Sabzawari, Sayyid Abd al-A'la (1413 AH/1992). Muhaḏḏab al-aḥkām (Vol. 2). Qom: Al-Manar Institute [in Arabic].
Sadeqi, Mohammad (1392 SH/2013). Emkān-sanjī va tamāyozāt-e ḥākemīyat-e qānūn dar ḥokūmat-e dīnī va ġeyr-dīnī [Feasibility and Distinctions of the Rule of Law in Religious and Non-Religious Governments]. Majalleh-ye Olum-e Qur'ani va Hadis [Journal of Quranic and Hadith Sciences], Nos. 30-31, pp. 93-106 [in Persian].
Sadr, Mohammad Baqir (1403 AH/1983). al-Fatāwā al-wāḍiḥah wifqan li-maḏhab Ahl al-Bayt (ʿalayhim al-salām). Beirut: Dar al-Ta'aruf lil-Matbu'at [in Arabic].
Safari, Mohsen, & Badkoubeh Hezaveh, Arash (1400 SH/2021). Naqd va towjīh-e dalīl-e ʿaqlī dar tafsīr-e gozārehhā-ye ḥoqūqī [Critique and Justification of Rational Proof in the Interpretation of Legal Propositions]. Faslnameh-ye Motale'at-e Hoquq-e Khososi [Private Law Studies Quarterly Journal], No. 1, pp. 77-96 [in Persian].
Sayyid Fatemi, Sayyid Mohammad, & Nikouei, Majid (1396 SH/2017). Andīšeh-ye Ebn-e Sīnā; elhām-baḵš-e ḥoqūq-e ṭabīʿī-ye Ākvīnās [Avicenna's Thought: Inspiring Aquinas's Natural Law]. Faslnameh-ye Hoquq-e Tatbiqi-ye Hoquq-e Eslam va Gharb [Comparative Law of Islam and the West Quarterly], No. 76, pp. 2-49. doi: 10.22091/csiw.2015.754 [in Persian].
Shahid-e Awwal, Mohammad ibn Makki (n.d.). al-Qavāʿid va al-favāʾid (Vol. 1). Qom: Maktabat al-Mofid [in Arabic].
Shahid-e Sani, Zain al-Din ibn Ali (1384 SH/2005). Šarḥ-e Lomʿeh [Commentary on al-Lum'ah] (Ali Shirvani & Mohammad Masoud Abbasi, Trans.) (Vol. 6). Qom: Dar al-Elm Institute [in Persian].
Shirvani, Ali (1388 SH/2009). Tarjomeh-ye oṣūl-e feqh [Translation of Principles of Jurisprudence]. Qom: Bustan-e Ketab [in Persian].
Singer, Marcus G. (1392 SH/2013). Qāʿideh-ye ṭalāyī [The Golden Rule] (Zahra Gholamrezaei, Trans.). Majalleh-ye Motale'at-e Hekmat va Ma'refat [Journal of Wisdom and Knowledge Studies], No. 5, pp. 56-57 [in Persian].
Sutta-Nipata. (1947). Woven cadences of early Buddhists (E. M. Hare, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.
Tabatabai Hakim, Mohammad Saeed (1389 SH/2010). Muntaḵab al-masāʾil (Vol. 1). Qom: Mehr-e Samen al-A'immah [in Arabic].
The Dhammapada. (1985). The Buddha's path of wisdom (Acharya Buddharakkhita, Trans.). Kandy, Sri Lanka: Buddhist Publication Society.
The Gathas. (1989). The thought-provoking divine songs of Zarathushtra (Ali A. Jafarey, Trans.).
The Mahabharata. (2007). Anusasana Parva (Pratap Chandra Roy & D. N. Bose, Trans.).
Torkzadeh, Rezvan (1396 SH/2017). Mafhūm-e dalīl-e ʿaqlī [The Concept of Rational Proof] (Master's thesis). University of Quran and Hadith [in Persian].
Ramezany,F and Mirshekari,A . (2026). Delineating the Status of the Golden Rule in Islamic Jurisprudence. Journal of Islamic Law Research, 27(3), 1641-1684. doi: 10.30497/law.2026.249532.3937
MLA
Ramezany,F , and Mirshekari,A . "Delineating the Status of the Golden Rule in Islamic Jurisprudence", Journal of Islamic Law Research, 27, 3, 2026, 1641-1684. doi: 10.30497/law.2026.249532.3937
HARVARD
Ramezany F, Mirshekari A. (2026). 'Delineating the Status of the Golden Rule in Islamic Jurisprudence', Journal of Islamic Law Research, 27(3), pp. 1641-1684. doi: 10.30497/law.2026.249532.3937
CHICAGO
F Ramezany and A Mirshekari, "Delineating the Status of the Golden Rule in Islamic Jurisprudence," Journal of Islamic Law Research, 27 3 (2026): 1641-1684, doi: 10.30497/law.2026.249532.3937
VANCOUVER
Ramezany F, Mirshekari A. Delineating the Status of the Golden Rule in Islamic Jurisprudence. Journal of Islamic Law Research. 2026;27(3):1641-1684 (In Persian). doi: 10.30497/law.2026.249532.3937