Journal of Islamic Law Research

Journal of Islamic Law Research

Civil Liability of Employers for Damages Caused to Third Parties by the Actions of Contractors in the Legal System of Iran

Type : Research Article

Authors
1 LLM in Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
 ‌Context & Objective: The concept of civil liability for employers, particularly in relation to damages caused to third parties by actions in the workplace, is a critical area of civil responsibility law globally. In Iran, Article 12 of the Civil Liability Law, enacted in 1960, holds employers accountable for damages caused by their workers and administrative staff. However, the prevailing judicial practice and legal doctrine in Iran limit this provision to the traditional employer-employee relationship, thereby excluding contractors from its scope. This article seeks to challenge this interpretation by reconsidering the legal boundaries of employer liability, focusing on whether contractors should be included under the existing legal framework. The primary research question addressed is whether the provisions of Article 12 should extend to include damages caused by contractors.
 ‌Method & Approach: The article adopts a doctrinal approach to legal analysis, engaging with both Iranian legal theory and judicial practice. It compares the traditional distinctions between workers and contractors and explores the underlying legal justifications for employer liability. Additionally, the research includes comparative studies to highlight how other jurisdictions handle similar issues. The methodology focuses on analyzing legal texts, judicial decisions, and doctrinal interpretations to present a comprehensive examination of employer liability in the context of contractors.
 ‌Findings: The findings suggest that the justifications for holding employers liable for damages caused by workers are equally applicable to contractors. Through a logical and purposive interpretation of Article 12, aligned with the original intent of the legislation, the research concludes that there is a basis for extending the scope of employer liability to cover damages caused by contractors. The comparative studies further support this conclusion, showing that other legal systems have adopted similar interpretations.
 ‌Conclusion: The article concludes that the current limitations of Article 12 of the Iranian Civil Liability Law should be reconsidered. A broader interpretation that includes contractors would align the law with its intended purpose of ensuring fair compensation for third-party damages. This shift would enhance the consistency and comprehensiveness of the legal framework governing employer liability in Iran.
Keywords
Subjects

  1. Amid, Hasan (1364 SH/1985). Farhang-e ʿAmīd (Vol. 1) [Amid Dictionary]. Tehran: Amirkabir [in Persian].
  2. Babaei, Iraj (1380 SH/2001). Mabnā-ye Masʾūlīyat-e Kārfarmāyān dar Māddeh-ye 12-e Qānūn-e Masʾūlīyat-e Madanī [Basis of Employers' Liability in Article 12 of Civil Liability Law]. Pazhohesh-e Hoquq va Siyasat [Research in Law and Politics], pp. 14–38 [in Persian].
  3. Babaei, Iraj (1401 SH/2022). Masʾūlīyat-e Madanī va Eltezāmāt-e Ḵārej az Qarārdād [Civil Liability and Extra-Contractual Obligations]. Tehran: Mizan Legal Foundation [in Persian].
  4. Barron, Marya. (1999). Who's an independent contractor? Who's an employee?, 457–473.
  5. Dehkhoda, Ali Akbar (1377 SH/1998). Loġat-nāmeh [Dictionary]. Tehran: University of Tehran Press [in Persian].
  6. Flannigan, Robert. (1987). Enterprise control: The servant-independent contractor distinction. The University of Toronto Law Journal, 37(1), 25.
    https://doi.org/10.2307/825661 
  7. Giliker, Paula. (2010). Vicarious liability in tort: A comparative perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Gray, Anthony. (2018). Vicarious liability: Critique and reform. Oxford, UK; Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.
  9. Iraqi, Ezzatollah (1401 SH/2022). Ḥoqūq-e Kār (Vol. 1) [Labor Law]. Tehran: SAMT [in Persian].
  10. Karimi Tazehkand, Shahram, Erfani, Mahmoud, & Vahedizadeh, Javad (1396 SH/2017). Mabnā va Ḥodūd-e Masʾūlīyat-e Madanī-ye Peymān-kār [Basis and Scope of Contractor's Civil Liability]. Pazhoheshhay-e Hoquqi [Law Research Magazine], pp. 59–97 [in Persian].
  11. Katouzian, Nasser (1401 SH/2022). Elzām-hā-ye Ḵārej az Qarārdād; Masʾūlīyat-e Madanī (Vol. 2) [Extra-Contractual Obligations; Civil Liability]. Tehran: Ganj-e Danesh [in Persian].
  12. Khodabakhshi, Abdollah (1400 SH/2021). Jobrān-e Ḵasārat-e Kārgarān dar Neẓām-e Masʾūlīyat-e Madanī [Compensation for Workers' Loss in Civil Liability System]. Tehran: Enteshar Publishing Company [in Persian].
  13. Management and Planning Organization of Iran (1378 SH/1999). Šarāʾeṭ-e ʿUmūmī-ye Peymān [General Conditions of Contract]. [n.p.] [in Persian].
  14. Markesinis, Basil, & Deakin, Simon. (1999). Tort law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  15. Markesinis, Basil, & Unberath, Hannes. (2019). The German law of torts: A comparative treatise. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.
  16. Mirshekari, Abbas (1402 SH/2023). Resāleh-ye ʿAmalī dar Masʾūlīyat-e Madanī [Practical Treatise on Civil Liability]. Tehran: Enteshar Publishing Company [in Persian].
  17. Mozaffari, Morteza, & Mirzaei Moghadam, Mostafa (1402 SH/2023). Barresī-ye Šarṭ-e Esqāṭ-e Masʾūlīyat-e Nāšī az Ḥavādeṯ-e Kār dar Qarārdādhā-ye Peymān-kārī dar Partow-e Ravīyeh-ye Qażāʾī [Study of Exemption Clause for Work Accident Liability in Construction Contracts in Light of Judicial Practice]. Tahqiqat-e Hoquqi [Legal Research Journal], pp. 263–285 [in Persian].
  18. Nasiran, Davoud, & Nasiran, Nahid (1401 SH/2022). Masʾūlīyat-e Madanī-ye Šahrdārī Nāšī az Ḵaṭā-ye Peymān-kār [Municipal Civil Liability Arising from Contractor's Fault]. Do-faslnameh-ye Naqd va Tahlil-e Aray-e Qazayi [Judicial Opinions Critique and Analysis Biannual Journal], Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 585–607 [in Persian].
  19. Neyers, Jason W. (2005). A theory of vicarious liability. Alberta Law Review, 43, 287.
  20. Peel, Edwin, Goudkamp, James, Winfield, Percy Henry, & Jolowicz, John A. (2014). Winfield and Jolowicz on tort (19th ed.). London: Sweet & Maxwell.
  21. Rafiei, Ahmad (1392 SH/2013). Ḥoqūq-e Kār (Vol. 1) [Labor Law]. Tehran: Negah-e Bina [in Persian].
  22. Safai, Sayyid Hossein, & Rahimi, Habibollah (1402 SH/2023). Masʾūlīyat-e Madanī (Eltezāmāt-e Ḵārej az Qarārdād) [Civil Liability (Extra-Contractual Obligations)]. Tehran: SAMT [in Persian].
  23. Yazdanian, Alireza (1391 SH/2012). Naẓarīyeh-ye ʿUmūmī-ye Masʾūlīyat-e Madanī-ye Matbūʿ Nāšī az ʿAmal-e Tābeʿ dar Ḥoqūq-e Farānseh va Ṭarḥ-e Ān dar Ḥoqūq-e Īrān [General Theory of Employer's Civil Liability Arising from Employee's Act in French Law and Its Presentation in Iranian Law]. Majalleh-ye Hoquqi-ye Dadgostari [Justice Law Journal], Vol. 76, No. 77, pp. 35–68 [in Persian].
  24. Yazdanian, Alireza, & Niazi, Abbas (1393 SH/2014). Moṭālaʿeh-ye Toṭbīqī-ye Masʾūlīyat-e Tażāmonī dar Feqh va Ḥoqūq-e Farānseh [Comparative Study of Joint and Several Liability in Jurisprudence and French Law]. Molate'at-e Hoquq-e Tatbiqi-ye Mo'aser [Contemporary Comparative Law Studies], Vol. 5, No. 8, pp. 139–166 [in Persian].

  • Received 28 April 2025
  • Accepted 25 July 2025