Journal of Islamic Law Research

Journal of Islamic Law Research

Legal Analysis of the Impact of Criminal History Records on the Registration Process of Candidates for the Iranian Islamic Consultative Assembly

Type : Research Article

Authors
Aminollah Zamani 1
Ali Haji Hoseini 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Crime Prevention and Correctional, University of Judicial Sciences and Administrative Services, Tehran. Iran.
2 PhD Student in Public Law, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
10.30497/law.2025.247886.3723
Abstract
 ‌Context & Objective: The Islamic Republic of Iran's legislator has established specific criteria for determining the eligibility of candidates running for the Islamic Consultative Assembly (Majlis). Among these criteria, the "criminal history records" of candidates play a pivotal role in the registration process and the assessment of their qualifications. Despite the existence of regulations regarding criminal history records, significant ambiguity remains in both their definition and the extent of their impact on the electoral process. This ambiguity has led to inconsistent interpretations among the relevant authorities and bodies responsible for determining candidate eligibility. The primary objective of this study is to explore and clarify the influence of criminal history records on the registration process for Majlis candidates and to examine the legal implications of such records in the electoral framework. The research aims to answer the question of how criminal history records impact the registration process and the determination of eligibility for candidacy in Iranian parliamentary elections.
 ‌Method & Approach: This study adopts a doctrinal approach, focusing on an in-depth analysis of the relevant laws and regulations related to criminal history records and their influence on the registration of candidates for the Majlis. The authors conduct a detailed review of the legal framework, including criminal and electoral laws in Iran, and provide a new classification of the impact of criminal history records on the electoral process.
 ‌Findings: The study reveals that the redefinition of criminal history records within Iranian criminal and electoral laws plays a critical role in shaping the registration process for candidates. It finds that criminal history records, depending on their nature, can temporarily or permanently disqualify an individual from running for the Majlis during the registration phase. This finding highlights the significant impact of criminal history on candidates' ability to stand for election and the need for clearer legal definitions regarding criminal history records in the context of Iranian elections.
 ‌Conclusion: The paper emphasizes the importance of redefining criminal history records in Iranian law to ensure greater clarity and consistency in the registration process for Majlis candidates. By providing a more precise legal framework, the study advocates for the establishment of a clear and transparent system for assessing the impact of criminal history on candidacy. The findings underline the need for further legal reforms to address the ambiguity surrounding criminal history records and their effect on the electoral process, contributing to a more just and equitable electoral system.
Keywords
Islamic Consultative Assembly Elections
Social Rights
Supplementary Punishments
Criminal History Records
Subjects
  1. Abbasi Lahiji, Bizhan, Bagheri Khouzani, Mohammad Hasan & Farahani, Mohammad Sadegh (1402 SH/2023). Taʾammulī bar Shākhiṣahhā-ye Tażmīn-e Shafāfīyat-e Marbūṭ bih Nāmzadhā, Mujrī va Nāẓir-e Intikhābāt-e Majlis-e Shūrā-ye Islāmī; Bā Taʾkīd bar Siyāsathā-ye Kullī-ye Intikhābāt [A Reflection on Indicators of Guaranteeing Transparency in Relation to Candidates, Executive and Supervisor of Parliamentary Elections in Iran; with an Emphasis on General Policies of Elections]. Pazhuheshnameh Hoquq-e Eslami [Journal of Islamic Law Research], 24(1), pp. 29-52. doi: 10.30497/law.2023.243778.3324 [in Persian].
  2. Abbasi, Bijan & Jafari, Mostafa (1390 SH/2011). Barrasī-ye Taṭbīqī-ye Sharāyiṭ-e Intikhāb-kunandagān va Intikhāb-shavandagān dar Niẓām-e Intikhābātī-ye Majālis-e Īrān va Mālizī [Comparative Study of the Conditions of Electors and Elected Candidates in the Parliamentary Electoral Systems of Iran and Malaysia]. Majalleh Hoquq-e Tatbiqi [Comparative Law Journal], 2(2), pp. 115-132 [in Persian].
  3. Ardebili, Mohammad Ali (1386 SH/2007). Ḥuqūq-e Jazā-ye ʿUmūmī (Vol. 2) [General Criminal Law] (3rd ed.). Tehran: Mizan [in Persian].
  4. Baheri, Mohammad & Shokri, Reza (1389 SH/2010). Nigarishī bar Ḥuqūq-e Jazā-ye ʿUmūmī (Majmūʿah-ye Taqrīrāt-e Muḥammad Bāhirī va Mīrzā ʿAlī Akbar Dāvar) [An Approach to General Criminal Law (Collection of Lectures by Mohammad Baheri and Mirza Ali Akbar Davar)] (3rd ed.). Tehran: Majd Scientific and Cultural Assembly [in Persian].
  5. Bozorgmehri, Majid (1385 SH/2006). Barrasī-ye Taṭbīqī-ye Sharāyiṭ-e Intikhāb-kunandagān va Intikhāb-shavandagān dar Niẓām-e Intikhābātī-ye Riyāsat-Jumhūrī-ye Īrān va Farānsah [Comparative Study of the Conditions of Electors and Elected Candidates in the Presidential Electoral Systems of Iran and France]. Majalleh Hoquq-e Asasi [Constitutional Law Journal], 4(67), pp. 45-56 [in Persian].
  6. Dharia, Megha, & Lavine, Rikki. (2020). What should presidential candidates tell us about themselves? Proposals for improving transparency in presidential campaigns. Fordham University, 1-39.
  7. Elham, Gholamhossein & Borhani, Mohsen (1392 SH/2013). Darāmadī bar Ḥuqūq-e Jazā-ye ʿUmūmī (Vākunesh dar Barābar-e Jurm) [An Introduction to General Criminal Law (Reaction to Crime)] (1st ed.). Tehran: Mizan [in Persian].
  8. Gheysari, Nourollah, Taheri Fadafen, Danial & Bagheri Farsani, Mehdi (1394 SH/2015). Mudīrīyat-e Intikhābāt dar Īrān, Kayfīyat va Arzyābī-ye Ijrā [Election Management in Iran, Quality and Evaluation of Implementation]. Majalleh Pazhuhesh-e Rahbordi-ye Siasat [Strategic Policy Research Journal], 4(13), pp. 10-34 [in Persian].
  9. Gorji, Ali Akbar (1389 SH/2010). ʿAdālat-e Ravīyahʾī va Taḥavvulgarāyī dar Lāyiḥah-ye Āyīn-e Dādrasī-ye Dīvān-e ʿAdālat-e Idārī [Procedural Justice and Transformationalism in the Administrative Justice Court Procedure Bill]. Majalleh Pazhuhesh-e Hoquq [Law Research Journal], 2(2), pp. 352-386 [in Persian].
  10. Hashemi, Seyyed Mohammad (1384 SH/2005). Ḥuqūq-e Bashar va Āzādīhā-ye Asāsī [Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms]. Tehran: Mizan [in Persian].
  11. Jafari Langroudi, Mohammad Jafar (1378 SH/1999). Vasīṭ dar Tirmīnūlūzhī-ye Ḥuqūq [Vasit in Terminology of Law] (3rd ed.). Tehran: Ganj-e Danesh [in Persian].
  12. Khosravi, Hasan (1387 SH/2008). Ḥuqūq-e Intikhābāt-e Dimukrātīk [Democratic Election Law] (1st ed.). Tehran: Majd Scientific and Cultural Assembly [in Persian].
  13. Mansourian, Mostafa & Bagheri Khouzani, Mohammad Hasan (1403 SH/2024). Qalamraw-e Ṣalāḥīyat-e Qānūnguẕār-e ʿĀdī dar Taʿyīn-e Sharāyiṭ-e Nāmzadhā-ye Intikhābāt-e Majlis-e Shūrā-ye Islāmī; Ravīyah-ye Shūrā-ye Nighahbān dar Būtah-ye Naqd [The Scope of Authority of Iran's Ordinary Legislator in Determining the Eligibility Conditions for Candidates in the Islamic Consultative Assembly Elections: A Critical Review of the Guardian Council's Approach]. Pazhuheshnameh Hoquq-e Eslami [Journal of Islamic Law Research], 26(2), pp. 1-24. doi: 10.30497/law.2024.245864.3499 [in Persian].
  14. Mansourinia, Zeynab (1400 SH/2021). Aṣl-e Ḥākimīyat-e Qānūn dar Sāzmānhā-ye Idārī [The Principle of the Rule of Law in Administrative Organizations]. Tehran: Qanounyar [in Persian].
  15. Moin, Mohammad (1387 SH/2008). Farhang-e Fārsī [Persian Dictionary]. Tehran: Sahel [in Persian].
  16. Pedersen, Rasmus T. (2019). Voter reactions to candidate background characteristics depend on candidate policy positions. Electoral Studies, 1-8.
  17. Pourghahremani, Babak & Teymouri, Mehrdad (1401 SH/2022). Muṭālaʿah-ye Taṭbīqī-ye Nahād-e Sijill-e Qażāyī dar Ḥuqūq-e Islām, Īrān va Farānsah [Comparative Study of the Institution of Judicial Record in the Law of Islam, Iran, and France]. Majalleh Hoquq-e Tatbiqi [Comparative Law Journal], 6(1), pp. 59-79. doi: 10.22080/lps.2022.23615.1343 [in Persian].
  18. Rezaeizadeh, Mohammad Javad & Davari, Mohsen (1395 SH/2016). Mabānī va Uṣūl-e Tashkhīṣ-e Ṣalāḥīyat-e Namāyandagī-ye Majlis-e Shūrā-ye Islāmī [Fundamentals and Principles of Determining the Competency for Representation in the Islamic Consultative Assembly]. Majalleh Danesh-e Hoquq-e Omoumi [Public Law Knowledge Journal], 5(14), pp. 117-142 [in Persian].
  19. Rostami Ghazani, Omid & Vaezi, Omid (1390 SH/2011). Mujāzāt-e Tabaʿī dar Fiqh-e Imāmīyah [Consequential Punishment in Imami Jurisprudence]. Majalleh Didgah-e Hoquq-e Qazaei [Journal of Judicial Law Perspectives], No. 2, pp. 65-93 [in Persian].
  20. Salehi Moghaddam, Mehdi, Hosseini, Shahrbanoo & Asghari, Abdolreza (1398 SH/2019). Chālishhā-ye Fiqhī-ye Taḥmīl-e Mujāzāthā-ye Tabaʿī va Takmīlī bar Murtakibān-e Jarāyim-e Ḥaddī va Qiṣāṣ [Jurisprudential Challenges of Imposing Consequential and Complementary Punishments on Perpetrators of Hudud and Qisas Crimes]. Majalleh Amouzeh-ha-ye Hoquq-e Keyfari [Criminal Law Doctrines Journal], No. 16, pp. 157-186 [in Persian].
  21. Sharifi, Mahrokh & Rajabiyeh, Mohammad Hossein (1395 SH/2016). Barrasī-ye Sijill-e Kayfarī va ʿAdam-e Sūʾ-e Pīshīnah dar Ḥuqūq-e Īrān [A Review of Criminal Records and Clean Record Certificates in Iranian Law]. Majalleh Motaleat-e Oloum-e Siasi, Hoquq va Feqh [Journal of Political Science, Law and Jurisprudence Studies], 2(2), pp. 19-29 [in Persian].
  22. Tahan Nazif, Hadi & Ghelichpour, Sajjad (1400 SH/2021). Āsībshināsī-ye Taʿyīn-e Sharāyiṭ-e Dāvṭalabān-e Namāyandagī-ye Majlis dar Partaw-e Qānūn-e Asāsī va Siyāsathā-ye Kullī-ye Intikhābāt [Pathology of Determining the Conditions of Parliamentary Candidates in Light of the Constitution and General Election Policies]. Faslnameh Danesh-e Hoquq-e Omoumi [Public Law Knowledge Quarterly], 10(1) [in Persian].
  23. The Representation of the People Act, 1951. An Act to provide for the conduct of elections to the Houses of Parliament (UN) and to the House or Houses of the Legislature of each State, 17th July, 1951. Available at:
    https://ceodelhi.gov.in/WriteReadData/ManualElectionLaw/REPRESENTATION%20OF%20THE%20PEOPLE%20ACT,%201950.pdf 
  24. Yavari, Asadollah (1396 SH/2017). Barrasī-ye Ṣalāḥīyat-e Nāmzadhā-ye Intikhābāt Tavassuṭ-e Shūrā-ye Nighahbān; Taʾammulī Dīgar [Review of Candidates' Qualifications by the Guardian Council; Another Reflection]. Majalleh Tahqiqat-e Hoquqi [Legal Research Journal], 20(4), pp. 213-237. doi: 10.22034/jlr.2018.111274.1050 [in Persian].
  25. Zarei, Mohammad Hossein (1376 SH/1997). Taḥlīlī az Payvand-e Ḥuqūq-e Idārī va Mudīrīyat-e Dawlatī bar Pāyah-ye Ḥākimīyat-e Qānūn [An Analysis of the Link Between Administrative Law and Public Administration Based on the Rule of Law]. Tehran: Modiriyat-e Dolati [in Persian].
  26. Zeraat, Abbas (1392 SH/2013). Ḥuqūq-e Jazā-ye ʿUmūmī (Vol. 2) [General Criminal Law]. Tehran: Jangal [in Persian].

  • Received 01 March 2025
  • Accepted 30 April 2025